This domain name is up for sale. Please send your offer to

2.2L compared to 2.0L

N/A tech, Cold Air Intakes, Spark Plugs/wires, Cat backs, Exhaust...etc

Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group

Re: 2.2L compared to 2.0L

Postby gse_turbo » Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:38 am

I apologize, I have seen your email and I will be getting back to you very soon.

As for the tuning, I'm sure we would all welcome a viable tuning solution if there is one. I've never even heard of a source. Do you have more info?
User avatar
DTM Daewoo Mod
Posts: 2392
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:20 am
Location: Englewood, Colorado United States

Re: 2.2L compared to 2.0L

Postby Nathan » Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:46 pm

Well, here is a manual on the very last page it basically states that any GM vehicles after 96' should be programmable. If this applies to GM-DAT, I can't say, but I don't see why not.

And here and Engineer speaks about (in super broken English) something called "software of Card memoery of DCN" but he didn't provide any links sadly

OR we could all pitch in and buy this appearantly stolen piece of GM hardware LOL (joking...kind of) ... 92440.html
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:37 pm


Return to Engine/Intake/Exhaust

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest